Vision readiness ensures that service members (SMs) have the visual fitness required to perform their missions successfully, maintain deployability, and serve without duty limitations. However, SMs may become ineligible for deployment due to ocular and visual dysfunctions (OVDs); and even if they are still eligible for deployment, their performance may suffer due to a lack of diagnosis or treatment for these dysfunctions. Moreover, if ocular/vision-related dysfunctions are not diagnosed and managed at an early stage, the cost of health care related to treating these dysfunctions increases. 

While prior research has found that SMs are at high risk for OVDs—and particularly OVDs secondary to traumatic brain injuries (VDTBIs)—current screening processes across all SMs focus on detecting and addressing refractive errors (REs), such as myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism. As a result, other OVDs that SMs are at risk for may go undiagnosed and untreated. In this study, the authors gather data and develop models to ascertain the costs and benefits of moving from the current visual acuity screening process to comprehensive eye examinations intended to detect a wider range of OVDs earlier, including dry eye, glaucoma, keratoconus, corneal dystrophies, retinal dystrophies, REs, and VDTBIs. They draw on available data on the prevalence and incidence of these dysfunctions for the young adult U.S. population; factor in costs associated with exams, treatment, and discharges within the military context; and consider a range of values for the benefits of detecting otherwise undiagnosed OVDs among SMs.

Key Findings

Under a wide range of assumptions, baseline and periodic comprehensive eye exams are cost-effective relative to current basic acuity screening

  • The average benefits for periodic comprehensive eye exams for all SMs exceed their costs given the inputs of the authors' model.
  • More frequent exams are more cost-effective than less frequent exams, since these exams allow for earlier diagnoses of OVDs and more effective treatment.
  • For occupations for which visual readiness is most pivotal, the cost-effectiveness of comprehensive eye exams is highest.

Recommendations

  • The military should introduce periodic comprehensive eye exams, especially for SMs for whom the negative impacts of undiagnosed OVDs on contributions to the force are high.
  • Any systematic expansions of comprehensive eye exams would enable a greater understanding of the prevalence, incidence, and costs of OVDs among the unique SM population, helping future modeling efforts and vision-related policies.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
84 pages
List Price
$38.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 2024
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 84
  • Paperback Price: $38.00
  • Paperback ISBN/EAN: 1-9774-1312-9
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/RRA2188-1
  • Document Number: RR-A2188-1

Citation

RAND Style Manual

Vardavas, Raffaele, Philip Armour, Sai Prathyush Katragadda, Toyya Pujol-Gentry, Pedro Nascimento de Lima, Baqir Fateh, Helin Hernandez, Stacey Yi, Javier Rojas Aguilera, and Catria Gadwah-Meaden, Cost-Benefit Analysis of Comprehensive Military Eye Examination Policies, RAND Corporation, RR-A2188-1, 2024. As of April 8, 2025: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2188-1.html

Chicago Manual of Style

Vardavas, Raffaele, Philip Armour, Sai Prathyush Katragadda, Toyya Pujol-Gentry, Pedro Nascimento de Lima, Baqir Fateh, Helin Hernandez, Stacey Yi, Javier Rojas Aguilera, and Catria Gadwah-Meaden, Cost-Benefit Analysis of Comprehensive Military Eye Examination Policies. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2024. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2188-1.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This research was prepared for the Defense Health Agency Vision Center of Excellence Personnel and conducted within the Personnel, Readiness, and Health Program of the RAND National Security Research Division.

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.