Evaluating the U.S. Military's Progress Toward an Integrated Primary Prevention Workforce

Five-Year Process Evaluation Plan

Joie D. Acosta, Matthew Chinman, Patricia M. Herman, Stephanie Brooks Holliday, Wenjing Huang, Kyleanne M. Hunter, Kirsten M. Keller, Sapna J. Mendon-Plasek, Laura L. Miller, Amy L. Shearer, et al.

ResearchPublished Nov 6, 2024

Service members can harm others through sexual assault, harassment (e.g., sexual harassment, bullying, hazing, reprisal, retaliation), domestic abuse, child abuse and neglect, and intimate partner abuse and can harm themselves through attempting or dying by suicide. This range of harmful behaviors can affect service members' overall physical and mental health and be detrimental to force readiness. A robust prevention system is needed to address these harms. A dedicated, qualified, and competent prevention workforce across strategic, operational, and tactical levels is one of the cornerstones of a robust prevention system. In response to a recommendation from the Independent Review Committee on Sexual Assault in the Military, the U.S. Department of Defense is hiring roughly 2,000 Integrated Primary Prevention (IPP) personnel — individuals with particular knowledge and skills in the conduct of prevention activities. These individuals' sole function will be to conduct data-informed activities to prevent various harmful behaviors experienced by service members.

In this report, the authors describe the methods for evaluating progress toward fully implementing an IPP workforce. Once this five-year evaluation is completed, the findings will document how much progress has been made toward full implementation, including an understanding of the structure and functioning of the prevention infrastructure and prevention teams, leader support of IPP, and the quality and comprehensiveness of prevention plans. These findings will be useful for professionals responsible for addressing a variety of harmful behaviors (e.g., sexual assault, suicide) and for commanders and other senior-level military leaders and policymakers interested in improving the quality of efforts to prevent harmful behavior in the military.

Document Details

Citation

RAND Style Manual

Acosta, Joie D., Matthew Chinman, Patricia M. Herman, Stephanie Brooks Holliday, Wenjing Huang, Kyleanne M. Hunter, Kirsten M. Keller, Sapna J. Mendon-Plasek, Laura L. Miller, Amy L. Shearer, and Kayla M. Williams, Evaluating the U.S. Military's Progress Toward an Integrated Primary Prevention Workforce: Five-Year Process Evaluation Plan, RAND Corporation, RR-A2183-1, 2024. As of April 8, 2025: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2183-1.html

Chicago Manual of Style

Acosta, Joie D., Matthew Chinman, Patricia M. Herman, Stephanie Brooks Holliday, Wenjing Huang, Kyleanne M. Hunter, Kirsten M. Keller, Sapna J. Mendon-Plasek, Laura L. Miller, Amy L. Shearer, and Kayla M. Williams, Evaluating the U.S. Military's Progress Toward an Integrated Primary Prevention Workforce: Five-Year Process Evaluation Plan. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2024. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2183-1.html.
BibTeX RIS

This research was sponsored by the Office of Force Resiliency and conducted within the Personnel, Readiness, and Health Program of the RAND National Security Research Division (NSRD).

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.