Improving Operational Effectiveness

An M109A7 Self-Propelled Howitzer drives off after lighting the night sky with an illumination round during a training exercise, photo by Agustin Montanez/U.S. Army

An M109A7 Self-Propelled Howitzer drives off after lighting the night sky with an illumination round during a training exercise

Photo by Agustin Montanez/U.S. Army

Decisions on the distribution of forces among Army components should be driven first and foremost by the required readiness of forces to fulfill operational demands.

A variety of Arroyo research projects have investigated ways to improve the U.S. Army's operational effectiveness. One study reviews the new Army fitness test, emphasizing the need for more evidence to ensure its events predict combat performance effectively. The research highlights lower pass rates among women and National Guard troops, suggesting the need for a reevaluation of whether combat standards are a necessary metric for all Army jobs. Another project explores the potential of reimagined airborne forces for rapid response to deep inland challenges, providing decisionmakers with new crisis response options.

Additional studies emphasize the importance of accurately estimating troop requirements and providing adequate resources to prevent strategic failures. Arroyo researchers recommend enhancements to the Department of Defense's biosurveillance programs, with a focus on near-real-time analysis and improved integration. Finally, a research team revisits the impact of the repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," updating the analysis of sexual orientation among military personnel at the request of the Senate Armed Services Committee and the Secretary of Defense.